🔥 [Question of the Week] What's the ONE thing you wish AI could do in test automation that it can't yet?

Welcome back to Question of the Week — the AI edition!

AI tools have come a long way, but there are still plenty of gaps. What’s the feature or capability that would genuinely change how you test if AI could do it?

This week’s question: What’s the #1 thing you wish AI could do in test automation that it still can’t do reliably?

Be specific — the more detail you share, the better the discussion!


How to participate: Reply below. Upvote answers you agree with. Best response gets featured in our weekly digest!

Right now, AI is incredibly good at syntax generation (e.g., “Write a Playwright script to click this button”). What it cannot do reliably is look at a complex, end-to-end user workflow and determine if the system actually behaved correctly from a business logic standpoint.

What AI can do today:

  • Identify selectors and element IDs.

  • Generate boilerplate test scripts.

  • Catch basic visual regressions (e.g., “this button turned blue instead of red”).

What AI fails at reliably:

Knowing if the data behind the UI makes sense after a complex series of actions.

The Dream Feature: “Intent-Driven Oracle Testing”

I wish I could give an AI a high-level business requirement, and have it independently verify the system’s state across multiple layers (UI, API, and Database) without me having to hardcode every single assertion.

for me, the one and only is about the Exploratory Test
i can’t imagine if the AI could be testing without any direction but can find any issues
what a dream

My wish is that AI performing tasks but within sustainable budget else soon we would see that using AI in tech limited to some specific users

End to End Automation with one prompt.

I wish it should work like human, once the context is built it should preseve it and keep it in consideration

build it , make no mistakes !